This proposal, if passed, will onboard the 2nd batch of 5 collators on Centrifuge.

Selction of collators: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/centrifuge-collator-selection-process-part-2/5457

Proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP51.md

calls

CP51: Onboarding the 2nd batch of collators

This is the resubmission of [CM62](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-62-set-the-ideal-number-of-collators-to-10/5330).

This proposal will set the number of collators ( `collatorSelection.setDesiredCandidates` ) on the Centrifuge Chain to 10.
![image|690x167](upload://xuwwobRQ3bdwtkHjvsxtjIiLTIK.png)

Hash: `0xe6d835c7a6a6f368d55c6bd60635a8ac9e1c53a85df66db126bc717e5ef8d647`

The full description you can find on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-63-set-the-ideal-number-of-collators-to-10-resubmission/5365

Set the ideal number of collators to 10 (Resubmission)

This proposal will set the number of collators (`collatorSelection.setDesiredCandidates`) on Centrifuge Chain to 10 so next batch of 5 collators can onboard once they are selected.

Proposal hash: 0xe6d835c7a6a6f368d55c6bd60635a8ac9e1c53a85df66db126bc717e5ef8d647

Full description you can find on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-62-set-the-ideal-number-of-collators-to-10/5330

Set the ideal number of collators to 10

The proposal has the following hash: `0x384751fd17243c97b555eab548958b1ea3e2a7219669c2b97e9f65bf346010ae`
The proposal text can be found at: [IPFS](https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmTQEcQHtVmTdeT5vBNQ7HuYA8QUNyKDH6WQM9SL9U7Jhj)


```
Proposal Text:
# Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation 2023-03
By casting your vote on-chain, you indicate your approval of changing the Tinlake Rewards on Centrifuge as follows:

1. Mint approximately 1’900’000 CFG into the rewards account 4dpEcgqJNczMyoTnUuFTyTLSe5RuoSSoGZMqu3L6fvc8jBbd (set balance to 8,275,000 CFG)
2. Set rewards rate for TIN at 0.000225 CFG/DAI per day
2. Keep the same rewards rate for DROP at 0.0003 CFG/DAI per day
3. Keep the same rewards rate for Asset Originator rewards at 0.0000 CFG/DAI per day

These values will be valid until governance proceeds with another vote.
```
## References
1. [RFC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation-2023-03/5213)
2. [GitHub](https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP40.md)
3. [Opensquare Snapshot CP40](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/centrifuge/proposal/QmVsFJLpacuNFEgMuYzhZ3sZyVdmELvvqPsXQzgWqpwjHT)


<ins>Remember, that you don’t lose your CFG by voting on referenda - they are just locked for the duration of the vote. After that, they will be available for transfer again. You can make your vote count for more by voting with conviction which means that you can vote with up to 6X the amount of tokens you have, by locking them for a longer period of time.</ins>
 
If you want to know how voting with conviction works, you can check this short [post ](https://docs.centrifuge.io/use/onchain-voting/).

CP40(GI): Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation 2023-03

This Council Motion was created incorrectly and has been re-submitted as [Council Motion 61](https://centrifuge.subsquare.io/council/motion/61).

Please vote this motion down councillors.

proposal

CP40(GI): Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation 2023-03 (incorrect)

Detailed Description:
The Council has proposed this motion to update the Centrifuge accounts for the crowdloan so that the CFG can be claimed. The contribution was originally made from a multisig that is unable to claim the CFG for technical reasons. As a result, this proposal is to update the Merkle tree for the crowdloan to replace this address.

- More information could be found here: [Council Motion 59](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-59-update-crowdloan-reward-accounts/5290)

root

Update crowdloan reward accounts 


Good day Community! 
The Centrifuge Council has proposed a motion for opening the HRMP channel between Centrifuge and HydraDX. 


This motion is being fast-tracked at the same time and the council is voting on it now.

The governance process for this proposal will be as follows:

1. Create Council Motion 58 with pre-image hash `0xac71b6213e0f7cca7c3b8845a93e990ddc75f4780abdba315ee8364366944dfd`

2. Once the motion has passed, there will be a public referendum (Referendum 30) that all CFG token holders can vote on. The voting period will be 50,400 blocks (~7 day with an average block time of 12 seconds)

This post will be updated once the motions pass and the referendum vote is live.

- The full description of CP34(GI): [Open HRMP channels between Centrifuge and HydraDX ](https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP34.md) 

The whole process will require several steps in total before the HRMP channels are opened :point_down:
## Detailed Description

The procedure for opening the channels is as follows:

1.  [ Done ] HydraDX proposes to open the HydraDX to Centrifuge HRMP channel.
2. [ Done ] [Opensquare Snapshote vote: CP34(GI): Open HRMP channels between Centrifuge and HydraDX](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/centrifuge/proposal/QmPRYAjaKxEsEP26xMxPytZwt1fXWF1MJmb8x1JELomTn6)
3. [ Now ]  Centrifuge proposes (a batch) to accept the HydraDX to Centrifuge HRMP channel and open the Centrifuge to HydraDX HRMP channel
4. Wait until the proposal on step 3 gets approved & enacted.
5.  HydraDX accepts the Centrifuge to HydraDX HRMP channel
6.  Wait for another session on Polkadot for the change to be effective.


 
You can read a more detailed description of the whole process [here](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-open-hrmp-channels-between-centrifuge-and-hydradx/5104). 

 

<ins>Remember, that you don’t lose your CFG by voting on referenda - they are just locked for the duration of the vote. After that, they will be available for transfer again. You can make your vote count for more by voting with conviction which means that you can vote with up to 6X the amount of tokens you have, by locking them for a longer period of time.</ins>
 
If you want to know how voting with conviction works, you can check this short [post ](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/how-to-vote-on-a-referendum/4243).

CP34(GI): Open HRMP channels between Centrifuge and HydraDX

Untitled - motion #57

There was an issue with this submission as well so it was resubmitted as [Council Motion 56](https://centrifuge.subsquare.io/council/motion/2184993_0x3f403d92b370b24af769a70e188aefa0669563918f6aa006d5950847898f61c7).

assetId

decimals

name

symbol

existentialDeposit

location

additional

Fix XCM Asset Registration

This Council Motion was passed and executed correctly.

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-56-fix-xcm-asset-registration/5064

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-54-fix-xcm-asset-registration/5061

UPDATE: Unfortunately, due to the ongoing enactment and validation of Referendum 27, the Centrifuge Council should resubmit Council Motion 54 as [Council Motion 55](https://centrifuge.subsquare.io/council/motion/2184921_0x058c2af24feaaa2777cd09ba8395ff656418f8adaf78216853463af77d488ab5), because there was a possibility of democracy.preimage storage wipe during this period.

proposalHash

## List of content of this Runtime Upgrade
* [Substrate] Update parity dependencies - [#1115](https://github.com/centrifuge/centrifuge-chain/pull/1115)
* [Substrate] Weights v2
* [Substrate] Democracy Referendum & Agenda Migrations
* [Substrate] Migration that clears old preimages storage & releases locked bonds for each preimage
  * Anyone that had a preimage stored they would have to resubmit that preimage. The original bonded amount is returned to the user.

**Proposal on Proposal Repository (Github)**: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP3/CP24.md

**Release Notes**: https://github.com/centrifuge/centrifuge-chain/releases/tag/v0.10.24

**Full Changelog**: https://github.com/centrifuge/centrifuge-chain/compare/release-v0.10.21...release-v0.10.24


CP26 (EP): Runtime Upgrade 1016 

Councillors,

The OpenSquare Snapshot for [Renewal RWA Market rewards proposal 2022-12 (CP23)](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/centrifuge/proposal/QmaXhVQVWyrY6vjHha1wMQRrPhVv19yKo7NmEJRVjmxANo) has passed and a Council motion has been created. 

Council Motion 51 is now live: [SubSquare](https://centrifuge.subsquare.io/council/motion/2051246_0xe3a2a52c5b4e8edf08a9fae9708979708ec3aa8421a975487066ea10c39c72ec)

The proposal has the following hash: `0x2202f987f5cba32a84ae2ba612bffd213ace058b3803ce9c7c06186584d846fc`
The proposal text can be found at: [Pinata](https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmdVWJgPMuiwwAXuyxzmNNCLREaiGbsUFKvXiTChoVbVhe)

###  Proposal Text:

` # 2022-12 Renewal RWA Market rewards proposal`
`By casting your vote on chain, you indicate your approval of renewal RWA Market rewards as follows:`
`1. Mint 200,000 CFG into the RWA Market rewards account`
`4eFfMrhrGSx8GP5WVm5qDzaSL5qvsWUjvcJAnYxP7RZYJLs2 (set balance to 200,099.998 CFG)`


`## References`
`1. [RFC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-renewal-rwa-market-rewards-proposal-2022-12/4855) `
`2. [GitHub] (https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP4/CP23.md) `
`3. [Opensquare Snapshot](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/centrifuge/proposal/QmaXhVQVWyrY6vjHha1wMQRrPhVv19yKo7NmEJRVjmxANo)`

Please vote at your earliest convenience, Councillors.
Thank you.

CP23 (GI): Renewal RWA Market rewards proposal 2022-12

Councillors,

The OpenSquare Snapshot for (CP21) [Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/centrifuge/proposal/QmWSgMxq436g5EWs6RAnx9pkYcwY8dBHMGHsqYNGWJwkev) has passed and a Council motion has been created. 


Council Motion 52 is now live: [SubSquare](https://centrifuge.subsquare.io/council/motion/2051324_0x352a9217c0bcc7612383c6b587a629892e8251840dd9e7ad59e20e35a466e46b)

The proposal has the following hash: `0x153abcf2872f3beeaf2aff1fe0c5cba6df13adec475e22df157ae261b6ea984e`
The proposal text can be found at: [Pinata](https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmR1d7HBf5j7J4qHwSHesKA7qVggZYt4PCaKY4i6nJuA6E)

### Proposal Text:

`# Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation 2022-12`
`By casting your vote on-chain, you indicate your approval of changing the Tinlake Rewards on` `Centrifuge as follows:`

`1. Mint approximately 1’800’000 CFG into the rewards account` `4dpEcgqJNczMyoTnUuFTyTLSe5RuoSSoGZMqu3L6fvc8jBbd (set balance to 6,980,000 CFG)`
`2. Keep the same rewards rate for TIN/DROP at 0.0003 CFG/DAI per day`
`3. Keep the same rewards rate for Asset Originator rewards at 0.0000 CFG/DAI per day`

`These values will be valid until governance proceeds with another vote.`


#### References
1. [RFC] (https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation-2022-12/4893)
2. [GitHub] (https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP4/CP21.md)
3. [Opensquare Snapshot] 
 (https://voting.opensquare.io/space/centrifuge/proposal/QmWSgMxq436g5EWs6RAnx9pkYcwY8dBHMGHsqYNGWJwkev)

Please vote at your earliest convenience, Councillors.
Thank you.

CP21 (GI): Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation 2022-12

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-50-distribution-of-unclaimable-cfg-resubmission-3/4807

Distribution of unclaimable CFG rewards (resubmission 3)

Discussion: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-distribution-of-unclaimable-cfg-rewards/4622
[Council Motion 45](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-44-distribution-of-unclaimable-cfg-rewards/4707),[Council Motion 44](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-44-distribution-of-unclaimable-cfg-rewards/4707) didn't pass in the council due to wrong amount and as not enough councillors voted on the motion. We have therefore asked the council to resubmit it as Council Motion 49, with exactly the same parameters.

The text to the proposal can be found here:

```
# 2022-03-10 Distribution of unclaimable CFG rewards
By casting your vote on-chain, you indicate your approval of minting and distribution of unclaimable CFG rewards :
1. Mint  430 CFG into the Proxy account 4cTwGSYkbpeZn5byhuLe2MrZa22aQJ6st3HJHg7Fyx3RLg7m (set balance to 430 CFG)
## References
1. [Snapshot Vote] ( https://voting.opensquare.io/space/centrifuge/proposal/QmPAuWDj8WBCnE5JbXxTPGqNsVevVFkgpJdUnJz6bb6Fn9 )
2. [RFC] ( https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-distribution-of-unclaimable-cfg-rewards/4622 )
```

[https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmVJaYe2NDF8LJVV5kaznFLtCRJiFmj1dbLLQ1YaXjjXDd ](https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/QmVJaYe2NDF8LJVV5kaznFLtCRJiFmj1dbLLQ1YaXjjXDd)

You can see the proposal on Subsquare [here](https://centrifuge.subsquare.io/council/motion/1702826_0xc5def9bf968c2fa8e1e4282ea1d67b98e3d6559f50f7d8996dac4b5df6fc4b2a).

Councillors, please vote at your earliest convenience.

Distribution of unclaimable CFG rewards (resubmission 2)

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-48-reset-bridge-transfer-fees/4754

Reset Bridge transfer fees

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-47-accept-statemint-hrmp-channel-request/4738

 Accept Statemint HRMP channel request

Untitled - motion #46

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-45-distribution-of-unclaimable-cfg-rewards-resubmission/4733

This motion is a resubmission of Council Motion 44 with exactly the same parameters.

Distribution of unclaimable CFG rewards (resubmission)

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-44-distribution-of-unclaimable-cfg-rewards/4707

Distribution of unclaimable CFG rewards

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-43-onboarding-the-first-five-collators-on-centrifuge/4684

Onboarding the first five collators on Centrifuge

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-40-increase-the-number-of-bridge-relayers/4681

Increase the number of bridge relayers

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-39-send-xcm-to-polkadot-to-accept-moonbeams-hrmp-request/4679

Send XCM to Polkadot to accept Moonbeam's HRMP request

Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-41-onboarding-the-first-five-collators-on-centrifuge/4682

NOTE: Council Motion 41 & 42 (Onboarding the first five collators on Centrifuge) were both submitted incorrectly - Council Motion 43 is the correct one.